<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 642 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151743</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the land had no cost of acquisition and therefore was not subject to capital gains tax. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the valuation of the land as of April 1, 1981, based on the Government-approved valuer&#039;s report. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 642 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151743</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the land had no cost of acquisition and therefore was not subject to capital gains tax. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the valuation of the land as of April 1, 1981, based on the Government-approved valuer&#039;s report. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>