<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 546 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151738</link>
    <description>The Tribunal exercised judicial discretion to refuse an out-of-turn hearing where the monetary stake was considered insufficient to justify prioritisation. The application for early hearing was dismissed because the amount in dispute, at about Rs. 72 lakhs, was not regarded as enough to depart from the regular roster. The appeal was therefore directed to proceed in the ordinary course without expedited listing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:57:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 546 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151738</link>
      <description>The Tribunal exercised judicial discretion to refuse an out-of-turn hearing where the monetary stake was considered insufficient to justify prioritisation. The application for early hearing was dismissed because the amount in dispute, at about Rs. 72 lakhs, was not regarded as enough to depart from the regular roster. The appeal was therefore directed to proceed in the ordinary course without expedited listing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>