<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 596 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151736</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the assessment order due to its issuance in the name of a non-existent entity post-amalgamation, recognizing it as an irregularity that could be rectified. The Tribunal directed the AO to reframe the assessment in the correct name of the successor company. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 596 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151736</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the assessment order due to its issuance in the name of a non-existent entity post-amalgamation, recognizing it as an irregularity that could be rectified. The Tribunal directed the AO to reframe the assessment in the correct name of the successor company. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>