<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 553 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151702</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s application to recall its order under section 254(2) and deemed the rectification application under the same section not maintainable. The Tribunal cited precedents to support its decision, emphasizing that adjournments due to strikes by the Tax Bar Association are impermissible and there is no provision for rectifying an order passed under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act. The decision was pronounced on May 25, 2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 553 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151702</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s application to recall its order under section 254(2) and deemed the rectification application under the same section not maintainable. The Tribunal cited precedents to support its decision, emphasizing that adjournments due to strikes by the Tax Bar Association are impermissible and there is no provision for rectifying an order passed under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act. The decision was pronounced on May 25, 2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>