<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 749 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, noting that the assessee had disclosed all material facts and the issue was debatable. The Tribunal found that the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:15:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 749 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, noting that the assessee had disclosed all material facts and the issue was debatable. The Tribunal found that the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>