<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 921 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151644</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete the addition disallowing the write-off of work in progress, ruling that the work-in-progress was revenue in nature and justified the nil valuation. The cross-objection for depreciation was dismissed as the addition was deleted. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:21:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 921 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151644</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete the addition disallowing the write-off of work in progress, ruling that the work-in-progress was revenue in nature and justified the nil valuation. The cross-objection for depreciation was dismissed as the addition was deleted. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>