https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151642 The court found that the respondent was given a fair opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and present his case during the enquiry, ruling that the process was not flawed. It was noted that the denial of making an oral statement and examining defense witnesses did not render the enquiry defective, as the rules of natural justice were observed. Despite deeming a writ petition under Article 226 inappropriate for such disputes, the court proceeded to address the case's merits due to time constraints for a civil suit. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the High Court's decision was overturned, and the writ application was rejected. en-us Wed, 18 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151642 The court found that the respondent was given a fair opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and present his case during the enquiry, ruling that the process was not flawed. It was noted that the denial of making an oral statement and examining defense witnesses did not render the enquiry defective, as the rules of natural justice were observed. Despite deeming a writ petition under Article 226 inappropriate for such disputes, the court proceeded to address the case's merits due to time constraints for a civil suit. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the High Court's decision was overturned, and the writ application was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151642