<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (11) TMI 129 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151621</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court held that an appellate authority in assessment proceedings cannot extend the protective effect of an earlier determination under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, where the statute confers that power only in determination proceedings. Section 52(2) was described as a limited power, and the Tribunal was bound to act strictly within the four corners of the Act. A plea for broader equitable relief under section 55(6) was rejected because it could not justify reading into the statute a power not expressly granted. The Tribunal&#039;s extension of the earlier determination was therefore beyond jurisdiction and answered against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:55:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (11) TMI 129 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151621</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court held that an appellate authority in assessment proceedings cannot extend the protective effect of an earlier determination under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, where the statute confers that power only in determination proceedings. Section 52(2) was described as a limited power, and the Tribunal was bound to act strictly within the four corners of the Act. A plea for broader equitable relief under section 55(6) was rejected because it could not justify reading into the statute a power not expressly granted. The Tribunal&#039;s extension of the earlier determination was therefore beyond jurisdiction and answered against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>