<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (11) TMI 128 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151618</link>
    <description>Waste hypo water was not treated as bullion merely because silver could later be extracted from it. The Bombay High Court held that, in ordinary commercial understanding, bullion means the precious metal itself, and a substance sold for recovery of another material remains a sale of that substance. Because the contract showed the buyers took the hypo water by quantity and paid a rate per gallon, the bargain was for the liquid itself, not for the recoverable silver. The sale therefore fell outside entry 23 of Schedule B to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 and was taxable under the residuary entry, with the question answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:43:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (11) TMI 128 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151618</link>
      <description>Waste hypo water was not treated as bullion merely because silver could later be extracted from it. The Bombay High Court held that, in ordinary commercial understanding, bullion means the precious metal itself, and a substance sold for recovery of another material remains a sale of that substance. Because the contract showed the buyers took the hypo water by quantity and paid a rate per gallon, the bargain was for the liquid itself, not for the recoverable silver. The sale therefore fell outside entry 23 of Schedule B to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 and was taxable under the residuary entry, with the question answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>