<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 981 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151606</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. The grounds related to deemed dividend and interest on borrowings were allowed, as the provisions were found in favor of the assessee. However, the ground related to depreciation on office premises was dismissed due to lack of evidence supporting business use. The order was pronounced on January 12, 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:07:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 981 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151606</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. The grounds related to deemed dividend and interest on borrowings were allowed, as the provisions were found in favor of the assessee. However, the ground related to depreciation on office premises was dismissed due to lack of evidence supporting business use. The order was pronounced on January 12, 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>