<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 727 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151590</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) deleted the addition of Rs. 12,50,000 under section 68 related to share application money, concluding the transactions were genuine. However, the Tribunal found errors in this decision, remitting the matter back to the Assessing Officer for further examination of the credit&#039;s nature and verification of its explanation. The assessee was instructed to provide evidence regarding the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 727 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151590</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) deleted the addition of Rs. 12,50,000 under section 68 related to share application money, concluding the transactions were genuine. However, the Tribunal found errors in this decision, remitting the matter back to the Assessing Officer for further examination of the credit&#039;s nature and verification of its explanation. The assessee was instructed to provide evidence regarding the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>