<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 972 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151571</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal found no justification for the penalty as the necessary information was provided by the assessee, and there was no conscious act of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The decision was based on precedents and the distinction between quantum and penalty proceedings. The order was pronounced on August 24, 2009.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 972 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151571</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal found no justification for the penalty as the necessary information was provided by the assessee, and there was no conscious act of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The decision was based on precedents and the distinction between quantum and penalty proceedings. The order was pronounced on August 24, 2009.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>