<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 842 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151560</link>
    <description>An additional claim for deduction of bad debts, raised during assessment and supported by facts already on record, could be entertained by the Tribunal even though it was not made through a revised return. The Tribunal applied the principle that Goetze (India) Ltd. does not restrict its power to admit an additional ground or claim where the relevant material is already available. The additional evidence was admitted, and because the merits of the claim had not been examined by the lower authorities, the matter was sent back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after giving the assessee due opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 842 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151560</link>
      <description>An additional claim for deduction of bad debts, raised during assessment and supported by facts already on record, could be entertained by the Tribunal even though it was not made through a revised return. The Tribunal applied the principle that Goetze (India) Ltd. does not restrict its power to admit an additional ground or claim where the relevant material is already available. The additional evidence was admitted, and because the merits of the claim had not been examined by the lower authorities, the matter was sent back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after giving the assessee due opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>