<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (4) TMI 160 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151543</link>
    <description>Section 7 conferred an option for compounded assessment on eligible dealers without prescribing any express time-limit for exercising that choice. After deletion of rule 15(4-B), the option had to be read with the statutory scheme rather than the deleted rule, and the absence of a specified deadline meant it could be exercised within a reasonable time. The commentary further notes that rule 15(4-A) concerned provisional assessment from the start of the year and did not control this option. As a beneficial provision for small traders, section 7 was not to be construed strictly, and the reasonable-time limit was taken to extend up to the making of the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:18:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (4) TMI 160 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151543</link>
      <description>Section 7 conferred an option for compounded assessment on eligible dealers without prescribing any express time-limit for exercising that choice. After deletion of rule 15(4-B), the option had to be read with the statutory scheme rather than the deleted rule, and the absence of a specified deadline meant it could be exercised within a reasonable time. The commentary further notes that rule 15(4-A) concerned provisional assessment from the start of the year and did not control this option. As a beneficial provision for small traders, section 7 was not to be construed strictly, and the reasonable-time limit was taken to extend up to the making of the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>