<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 981 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151517</link>
    <description>The appeal against the penalty imposed for claiming excess deduction under section 80-O of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was dismissed. The Tribunal held that the interest income from fixed deposits in India did not meet the criteria for deduction under section 80-O. As the claim was deemed incorrect and the assessee was found to have furnished inaccurate particulars of income, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was upheld in favor of the Revenue, overturning the previous decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:46:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 981 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151517</link>
      <description>The appeal against the penalty imposed for claiming excess deduction under section 80-O of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was dismissed. The Tribunal held that the interest income from fixed deposits in India did not meet the criteria for deduction under section 80-O. As the claim was deemed incorrect and the assessee was found to have furnished inaccurate particulars of income, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was upheld in favor of the Revenue, overturning the previous decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>