<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 972 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151515</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of incentives paid to Dock Labour Board workers by the assessee, emphasizing the need for sufficient evidence to support expense claims. Despite the payments not being illegal, the assessee failed to substantiate the claim, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The decision underscored the assessee&#039;s duty to prove expenses incurred and the repercussions of inadequate evidence, despite opportunities given.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:30:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 972 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151515</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of incentives paid to Dock Labour Board workers by the assessee, emphasizing the need for sufficient evidence to support expense claims. Despite the payments not being illegal, the assessee failed to substantiate the claim, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The decision underscored the assessee&#039;s duty to prove expenses incurred and the repercussions of inadequate evidence, despite opportunities given.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>