<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (5) TMI 76 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151513</link>
    <description>Rule 18 of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1949, requiring declarations for sales to registered dealers, was construed as directory rather than mandatory, so deduction could not be defeated solely for non-production of the prescribed form if substantial compliance and other material satisfied the taxing authority. However, the assessee&#039;s separate claim for deduction on aggregate credit sales was barred because an earlier finding that no adequate attempt had been made to satisfy the authority by other material had attained finality between the parties. On that basis, the deduction could not be reopened in the same assessment dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:23:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (5) TMI 76 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151513</link>
      <description>Rule 18 of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1949, requiring declarations for sales to registered dealers, was construed as directory rather than mandatory, so deduction could not be defeated solely for non-production of the prescribed form if substantial compliance and other material satisfied the taxing authority. However, the assessee&#039;s separate claim for deduction on aggregate credit sales was barred because an earlier finding that no adequate attempt had been made to satisfy the authority by other material had attained finality between the parties. On that basis, the deduction could not be reopened in the same assessment dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>