<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (11) TMI 123 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151501</link>
    <description>Dismantling an unserviceable ship to obtain iron and steel scrap and allied materials was treated as manufacture because the activity produced a commercially distinct commodity. The ship, to the extent of its frame, hull or body proper, was therefore used as material in manufacture and purchase tax was attracted under section 13(a) on the corresponding part of the purchase price. The plea that the transaction was merely a purchase of scrap, and the alternative request for remand to lead further evidence on the sale contract, were rejected because the record showed a purchase of a ship under an instrument of sale and there was sufficient material on the terms of sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:39:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (11) TMI 123 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151501</link>
      <description>Dismantling an unserviceable ship to obtain iron and steel scrap and allied materials was treated as manufacture because the activity produced a commercially distinct commodity. The ship, to the extent of its frame, hull or body proper, was therefore used as material in manufacture and purchase tax was attracted under section 13(a) on the corresponding part of the purchase price. The plea that the transaction was merely a purchase of scrap, and the alternative request for remand to lead further evidence on the sale contract, were rejected because the record showed a purchase of a ship under an instrument of sale and there was sufficient material on the terms of sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>