<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (11) TMI 120 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151479</link>
    <description>Sales to a foreign embassy located in New Delhi were not sales in the course of export merely because the buyer was a diplomatic mission; the territorial location of the premises remained within India for sales tax purposes. Diplomatic privileges and immunities did not alter that territorial character, and the Vienna Convention did not extend the relevant tax exemption to the indirect tax involved. A later CST notification was irrelevant to earlier transactions and was not merely clarificatory. The sales were therefore not exempt under article 286(1)(b), with the answer against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:02:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (11) TMI 120 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151479</link>
      <description>Sales to a foreign embassy located in New Delhi were not sales in the course of export merely because the buyer was a diplomatic mission; the territorial location of the premises remained within India for sales tax purposes. Diplomatic privileges and immunities did not alter that territorial character, and the Vienna Convention did not extend the relevant tax exemption to the indirect tax involved. A later CST notification was irrelevant to earlier transactions and was not merely clarificatory. The sales were therefore not exempt under article 286(1)(b), with the answer against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>