<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 964 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, permitting the deduction of the refunded amount to the Customs Department as a business expense, partially disallowing business promotion expenses, and remanding issues regarding interest income classification and DEPB receipts for fresh examination. The Tribunal upheld the adjustment of brought forward losses before computing deductions under sections 80HHC and rejected the challenge to interest charges under sections 234B and 234D for the relevant assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:41:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 964 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, permitting the deduction of the refunded amount to the Customs Department as a business expense, partially disallowing business promotion expenses, and remanding issues regarding interest income classification and DEPB receipts for fresh examination. The Tribunal upheld the adjustment of brought forward losses before computing deductions under sections 80HHC and rejected the challenge to interest charges under sections 234B and 234D for the relevant assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>