<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 717 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151453</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue for statistical purposes and remanded the case to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) for a thorough review based on the provisions of the third proviso to section 80HHC(3). The Tribunal found that the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow the deduction without considering the conditions of the third proviso was not in accordance with the law, leading to the decision to set aside the issue for reexamination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:10:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 717 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151453</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue for statistical purposes and remanded the case to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) for a thorough review based on the provisions of the third proviso to section 80HHC(3). The Tribunal found that the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow the deduction without considering the conditions of the third proviso was not in accordance with the law, leading to the decision to set aside the issue for reexamination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>