<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 715 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the assessee was liable for failing to deposit tax deducted at source (TDS) into the Government account, resulting in default under section 201(1). Financial difficulties were not considered a valid excuse for non-compliance, emphasizing the obligation to promptly deposit TDS. The interest levy under section 201(1A) was affirmed as compensatory, leading to the dismissal of all appeals by the assessee regarding TDS default and interest liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:56:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 715 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the assessee was liable for failing to deposit tax deducted at source (TDS) into the Government account, resulting in default under section 201(1). Financial difficulties were not considered a valid excuse for non-compliance, emphasizing the obligation to promptly deposit TDS. The interest levy under section 201(1A) was affirmed as compensatory, leading to the dismissal of all appeals by the assessee regarding TDS default and interest liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>