<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 713 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151446</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal against the assessment of unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was dismissed. Despite concerns over the genuineness of share capital and share premium, the appellant failed to establish the identity and creditworthiness of share applicants. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision due to insufficient evidence and discrepancies in documentation. The burden of proof was placed on the assessee, following legal precedents emphasizing the need to prove the legitimacy of transactions. The Tribunal affirmed the dismissal of the appeal, citing the appellant&#039;s inability to provide satisfactory evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 713 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151446</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal against the assessment of unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was dismissed. Despite concerns over the genuineness of share capital and share premium, the appellant failed to establish the identity and creditworthiness of share applicants. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision due to insufficient evidence and discrepancies in documentation. The burden of proof was placed on the assessee, following legal precedents emphasizing the need to prove the legitimacy of transactions. The Tribunal affirmed the dismissal of the appeal, citing the appellant&#039;s inability to provide satisfactory evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>