<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (2) TMI 174 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151437</link>
    <description>The Court held that battery plates should be taxed under section 3(1) at multi-point, rather than under entry 41 of the First Schedule, as they were considered accessories to electrical goods and thus fell under a specific entry (entry 3-A) for batteries. The introduction of a special entry for batteries implied their exclusion from the general provision of entry 41. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to tax the battery plates under entry 41 was overturned, and the correct tax treatment was determined to be under section 3(1) at multi-point for the relevant assessment year. The tax revision petitions were allowed with costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 18:08:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (2) TMI 174 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151437</link>
      <description>The Court held that battery plates should be taxed under section 3(1) at multi-point, rather than under entry 41 of the First Schedule, as they were considered accessories to electrical goods and thus fell under a specific entry (entry 3-A) for batteries. The introduction of a special entry for batteries implied their exclusion from the general provision of entry 41. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to tax the battery plates under entry 41 was overturned, and the correct tax treatment was determined to be under section 3(1) at multi-point for the relevant assessment year. The tax revision petitions were allowed with costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>