<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (2) TMI 170 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151379</link>
    <description>Invoices stating that sale prices were &quot;inclusive of sales tax&quot; were treated as evidence of tax collection where the assessee also collected the stated amounts and kept no separate account for sales-tax receipts. The Court held that a claimant for exemption bears the burden of proving entitlement, and the absence of separate book entries did not negate the invoice notation or establish that it was inserted only for the purchaser&#039;s benefit. On those facts, the amounts were treated as sales tax collected, and exemption under section 10 of the Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1969 was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:36:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (2) TMI 170 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151379</link>
      <description>Invoices stating that sale prices were &quot;inclusive of sales tax&quot; were treated as evidence of tax collection where the assessee also collected the stated amounts and kept no separate account for sales-tax receipts. The Court held that a claimant for exemption bears the burden of proving entitlement, and the absence of separate book entries did not negate the invoice notation or establish that it was inserted only for the purchaser&#039;s benefit. On those facts, the amounts were treated as sales tax collected, and exemption under section 10 of the Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1969 was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>