<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (1) TMI 139 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151377</link>
    <description>An electric powered fork-lift truck used mainly for stacking goods within factory premises was held not to fall within the motor vehicle entry in Schedule C under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The decisive test was its primary function in common parlance: a motor vehicle under that entry is one intended to transport persons or goods over a substantial distance, whereas a machine primarily meant for vertical lifting and internal movement does not answer that description. It therefore fell under the residuary entry in Schedule E. The classification turned on dominant use and ordinary commercial meaning, not on the mere fact that the machine was self-propelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (1) TMI 139 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151377</link>
      <description>An electric powered fork-lift truck used mainly for stacking goods within factory premises was held not to fall within the motor vehicle entry in Schedule C under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The decisive test was its primary function in common parlance: a motor vehicle under that entry is one intended to transport persons or goods over a substantial distance, whereas a machine primarily meant for vertical lifting and internal movement does not answer that description. It therefore fell under the residuary entry in Schedule E. The classification turned on dominant use and ordinary commercial meaning, not on the mere fact that the machine was self-propelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>