<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (10) TMI 139 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151343</link>
    <description>Processing groundnuts into parched groundnuts creates a commercially distinct commodity with changed moisture, oil content, taste and market identity, so the statutory bar on sales tax for goods already subjected to purchase tax applies only where the sale is of the same goods. Sales tax could therefore be levied on parched groundnuts despite purchase tax on raw groundnuts. The amendment to Schedule C including groundnuts within the oil-seed entry did not alter this commercial distinction; the earlier test for identifying oil-seeds in common parlance was affirmed, but its final conclusion on groundnuts was held to be incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 17:23:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (10) TMI 139 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151343</link>
      <description>Processing groundnuts into parched groundnuts creates a commercially distinct commodity with changed moisture, oil content, taste and market identity, so the statutory bar on sales tax for goods already subjected to purchase tax applies only where the sale is of the same goods. Sales tax could therefore be levied on parched groundnuts despite purchase tax on raw groundnuts. The amendment to Schedule C including groundnuts within the oil-seed entry did not alter this commercial distinction; the earlier test for identifying oil-seeds in common parlance was affirmed, but its final conclusion on groundnuts was held to be incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>