<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (2) TMI 167 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151336</link>
    <description>Properly maintained account books cannot be rejected merely because two purchase vouchers were not entered at the time of survey, where there is no finding that the transactions were never recorded later. An explanation that the purchases were made through the munim remained unrebutted, and a third-party letter alleging two sets of accounts could not be used against the assessee without proof of authorship or supporting evidence. The revising authority, as final fact-finder, was therefore entitled to accept the book version on the material before it, and its conclusion was not arbitrary or unsupported by evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:53:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (2) TMI 167 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151336</link>
      <description>Properly maintained account books cannot be rejected merely because two purchase vouchers were not entered at the time of survey, where there is no finding that the transactions were never recorded later. An explanation that the purchases were made through the munim remained unrebutted, and a third-party letter alleging two sets of accounts could not be used against the assessee without proof of authorship or supporting evidence. The revising authority, as final fact-finder, was therefore entitled to accept the book version on the material before it, and its conclusion was not arbitrary or unsupported by evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>