<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (11) TMI 158 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151328</link>
    <description>Distribution boxes specially designed to an Electricity Board&#039;s specifications, and essential for enclosing and protecting meter boards, fuses and cleats, were treated in common parlance as accessories to electrical goods rather than mere containers. The Court accepted the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding that the boxes contributed to the safety and effective use of the main articles, and held that an item serving as an additional fixture in a subordinate but functional role qualifies as an accessory. The contention that the boxes were only receptacles for storage or carriage was rejected, and they were brought within item 37 of the First Schedule as electrical goods taxable at the higher rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (11) TMI 158 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151328</link>
      <description>Distribution boxes specially designed to an Electricity Board&#039;s specifications, and essential for enclosing and protecting meter boards, fuses and cleats, were treated in common parlance as accessories to electrical goods rather than mere containers. The Court accepted the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding that the boxes contributed to the safety and effective use of the main articles, and held that an item serving as an additional fixture in a subordinate but functional role qualifies as an accessory. The contention that the boxes were only receptacles for storage or carriage was rejected, and they were brought within item 37 of the First Schedule as electrical goods taxable at the higher rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>