<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (10) TMI 136 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151327</link>
    <description>A revisional authority exercising wide powers to examine the legality and propriety of an appellate order may vary findings even in a revision filed only by the assessee, and may disturb the appellate view that firms are separate without a cross-revision by the State. Where the record shows a common business purpose, such as joint registration, description of one firm as a branch of the other, and common turnover returns, an association of persons can be inferred and the firms may be treated as a dealer for joint assessment purposes. The sufficiency of such material is not to be reappraised once relevant evidence exists.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:05:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (10) TMI 136 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151327</link>
      <description>A revisional authority exercising wide powers to examine the legality and propriety of an appellate order may vary findings even in a revision filed only by the assessee, and may disturb the appellate view that firms are separate without a cross-revision by the State. Where the record shows a common business purpose, such as joint registration, description of one firm as a branch of the other, and common turnover returns, an association of persons can be inferred and the firms may be treated as a dealer for joint assessment purposes. The sufficiency of such material is not to be reappraised once relevant evidence exists.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>