<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (12) TMI 172 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151320</link>
    <description>Leather cases made for transistors may qualify as accessories because an accessory is an article that adds convenience or effectiveness, even if it is not essential to operation; on that reasoning, the cases were treated as accessories under the sales tax entry. Leakproof battery cells, however, were not spare parts because a spare part must be a component of the apparatus itself, ready to replace an identical part, and the cells were neither exclusive to transistors nor part of the transistor body. They were therefore not treated as spare parts or electrical goods under the schedule and were liable only under the general taxing provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 14:21:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (12) TMI 172 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151320</link>
      <description>Leather cases made for transistors may qualify as accessories because an accessory is an article that adds convenience or effectiveness, even if it is not essential to operation; on that reasoning, the cases were treated as accessories under the sales tax entry. Leakproof battery cells, however, were not spare parts because a spare part must be a component of the apparatus itself, ready to replace an identical part, and the cells were neither exclusive to transistors nor part of the transistor body. They were therefore not treated as spare parts or electrical goods under the schedule and were liable only under the general taxing provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>