<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (7) TMI 150 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151316</link>
    <description>Under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, sugar-candy was treated as a separate taxable item and not as exempt &quot;sugar&quot; in the schedule entries. The statutory scheme under section 6, read with the Third Schedule, imposed tax on declared goods at the specified rate and point, while sugar was exempt under section 8 read with the Fourth Schedule. The definitions drawn from the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 did not require sugar-candy to be classified as sugar for exemption purposes. In common parlance, the two were distinct, and the legislative separation in different schedules confirmed taxability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:13:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (7) TMI 150 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151316</link>
      <description>Under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, sugar-candy was treated as a separate taxable item and not as exempt &quot;sugar&quot; in the schedule entries. The statutory scheme under section 6, read with the Third Schedule, imposed tax on declared goods at the specified rate and point, while sugar was exempt under section 8 read with the Fourth Schedule. The definitions drawn from the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 did not require sugar-candy to be classified as sugar for exemption purposes. In common parlance, the two were distinct, and the legislative separation in different schedules confirmed taxability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>