<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (4) TMI 156 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151310</link>
    <description>Collar stiffening material was not treated as a textile exempt under item 4 of the Third Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act because the processing altered the cloth beyond a mere textile article. However, it was held to remain a cotton fabric within section 14(iia) of the Central Sales Tax Act read with item 19 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, since it was manufactured from cotton and did not lose that character merely because it was adapted for specialised use. The assessee succeeded on the central sales tax issue, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration of the tax consequence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 18:33:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (4) TMI 156 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151310</link>
      <description>Collar stiffening material was not treated as a textile exempt under item 4 of the Third Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act because the processing altered the cloth beyond a mere textile article. However, it was held to remain a cotton fabric within section 14(iia) of the Central Sales Tax Act read with item 19 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, since it was manufactured from cotton and did not lose that character merely because it was adapted for specialised use. The assessee succeeded on the central sales tax issue, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration of the tax consequence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>