<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (11) TMI 180 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151308</link>
    <description>Form C declarations under the Central Sales Tax Act must be read with the registration certificate to identify the permitted end use of concessional purchases. Where splints were bought on the representation that they would be used in the purchaser&#039;s own factory for manufacturing matches, but were instead resold, the declaration was violated. That misuse of concessional purchase forms attracted the statutory penalty for contravention, and the penalty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 18:28:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (11) TMI 180 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151308</link>
      <description>Form C declarations under the Central Sales Tax Act must be read with the registration certificate to identify the permitted end use of concessional purchases. Where splints were bought on the representation that they would be used in the purchaser&#039;s own factory for manufacturing matches, but were instead resold, the declaration was violated. That misuse of concessional purchase forms attracted the statutory penalty for contravention, and the penalty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>