<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 710 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c). The decision was based on the genuine nature of the expenses, the bona fide debate regarding their classification as capital or revenue expenditure, and the absence of inaccurate or concealed particulars from the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:04:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 710 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c). The decision was based on the genuine nature of the expenses, the bona fide debate regarding their classification as capital or revenue expenditure, and the absence of inaccurate or concealed particulars from the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>