<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 839 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151218</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), ruling that the Assessing Officer lacked the authority to rectify the intimation under Section 143(1) to exclude arrears of rent included by the assessee in the returned income. The Tribunal emphasized that Section 143(1) does not permit adjustments to the returned income beyond arithmetic calculations, limiting the scope of rectification under Section 154(1)(b). Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 16:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 839 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151218</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), ruling that the Assessing Officer lacked the authority to rectify the intimation under Section 143(1) to exclude arrears of rent included by the assessee in the returned income. The Tribunal emphasized that Section 143(1) does not permit adjustments to the returned income beyond arithmetic calculations, limiting the scope of rectification under Section 154(1)(b). Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>