<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 211 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151198</link>
    <description>Where the employer supplied the principal material and the contractor&#039;s own materials were only incidental to fabrication and erection work, the arrangement was treated as a contract for work and labour rather than a sale of goods. The contract with the Bombay Port Trust was characterised as indivisible work and labour because the steel was supplied by the employer and the clauses focused on execution, supervision, inspection, and delay liability. The Century Rayon arrangement was also held to be work and labour, as any transfer of property was incidental to performance and not a separate sale for price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 14:54:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 211 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151198</link>
      <description>Where the employer supplied the principal material and the contractor&#039;s own materials were only incidental to fabrication and erection work, the arrangement was treated as a contract for work and labour rather than a sale of goods. The contract with the Bombay Port Trust was characterised as indivisible work and labour because the steel was supplied by the employer and the clauses focused on execution, supervision, inspection, and delay liability. The Century Rayon arrangement was also held to be work and labour, as any transfer of property was incidental to performance and not a separate sale for price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>