<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (8) TMI 116 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151190</link>
    <description>A petty dealer&#039;s practice of counting cash at the close of business and recording daily sales after adjustments is a recognised, though crude, accounting method, and it does not by itself justify rejection of account books absent evidence of suppression or breach of section 12 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act or rule 72 of the U.P. Sales Tax Rules. Assessment under the U.P. Sales Tax Act is year-specific, so rejection of books in an earlier year does not automatically support rejection in a later assessment year; each year must be judged on its own material. The account books could therefore not be rejected on either ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 14:24:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (8) TMI 116 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151190</link>
      <description>A petty dealer&#039;s practice of counting cash at the close of business and recording daily sales after adjustments is a recognised, though crude, accounting method, and it does not by itself justify rejection of account books absent evidence of suppression or breach of section 12 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act or rule 72 of the U.P. Sales Tax Rules. Assessment under the U.P. Sales Tax Act is year-specific, so rejection of books in an earlier year does not automatically support rejection in a later assessment year; each year must be judged on its own material. The account books could therefore not be rejected on either ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>