<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 765 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151189</link>
    <description>Foreign gifts may be treated as unexplained cash credits where the assessee fails to prove the donors&#039; identity, genuineness and creditworthiness on the basis of surrounding circumstances and human probabilities, and the addition under section 68 was sustained. Annual letting value of house properties must be determined on a proper legal basis, and the estimate was set aside for fresh examination by the Assessing Officer. Interest on borrowing against fixed deposits and onward advance of the funds to a company in which the assessee was a director was disallowed because commercial expediency was not established and no sustainable deduction basis was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 13:20:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 765 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151189</link>
      <description>Foreign gifts may be treated as unexplained cash credits where the assessee fails to prove the donors&#039; identity, genuineness and creditworthiness on the basis of surrounding circumstances and human probabilities, and the addition under section 68 was sustained. Annual letting value of house properties must be determined on a proper legal basis, and the estimate was set aside for fresh examination by the Assessing Officer. Interest on borrowing against fixed deposits and onward advance of the funds to a company in which the assessee was a director was disallowed because commercial expediency was not established and no sustainable deduction basis was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>