<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 932 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151153</link>
    <description>In block assessment proceedings, additions as undisclosed income require cogent supporting material and cannot rest on conjecture where the assessee&#039;s explanation is backed by contemporaneous records. Fixed deposits in family members&#039; names were explained through disclosed interest income, maturity proceeds, savings, gifts and other identified sources, so the unexplained investment addition failed. Bank credits and alleged construction cost of a third floor were supported by regular-return disclosures, seized material and explained transactions, so undisclosed sale consideration and further investment were not established. Loose notings for jewellery were also satisfactorily explained, and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 16:29:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 932 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151153</link>
      <description>In block assessment proceedings, additions as undisclosed income require cogent supporting material and cannot rest on conjecture where the assessee&#039;s explanation is backed by contemporaneous records. Fixed deposits in family members&#039; names were explained through disclosed interest income, maturity proceeds, savings, gifts and other identified sources, so the unexplained investment addition failed. Bank credits and alleged construction cost of a third floor were supported by regular-return disclosures, seized material and explained transactions, so undisclosed sale consideration and further investment were not established. Loose notings for jewellery were also satisfactorily explained, and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>