<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (4) TMI 196 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151148</link>
    <description>Composition of an offence for failure to maintain true and correct accounts under sections 40, 45(2)(d) and 46 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act does not bar a separate penalty under section 12(3) for filing incomplete, incorrect, or wilfully omitted returns. The two liabilities operate in different fields because each arises from an independent statutory default. No principle of double penalty applies where the compounding fee and the penalty relate to distinct contraventions. The Tribunal was therefore wrong in treating the earlier collection of compounding fee as a bar to penalty, and the penalty was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 16:02:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (4) TMI 196 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151148</link>
      <description>Composition of an offence for failure to maintain true and correct accounts under sections 40, 45(2)(d) and 46 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act does not bar a separate penalty under section 12(3) for filing incomplete, incorrect, or wilfully omitted returns. The two liabilities operate in different fields because each arises from an independent statutory default. No principle of double penalty applies where the compounding fee and the penalty relate to distinct contraventions. The Tribunal was therefore wrong in treating the earlier collection of compounding fee as a bar to penalty, and the penalty was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>