<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 159 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151130</link>
    <description>Tractors designed and manufactured primarily for agricultural work fall within the agricultural machinery exclusion in entry 44 of Part II of Schedule II to the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, even if they are capable of occasional non-agricultural use. The controlling test is the tractor&#039;s intrinsic character, including its design, mechanism, features and special adaptability, rather than exclusive agricultural use. Evidence that the tractors were licensed as farm tractors, designed for agricultural purposes and commonly used in farming supported their exclusion from tax. The view that exclusive agricultural use was required was disapproved, and incidental non-agricultural use was held insufficient to alter the tractor&#039;s agricultural character.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 16:56:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 159 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151130</link>
      <description>Tractors designed and manufactured primarily for agricultural work fall within the agricultural machinery exclusion in entry 44 of Part II of Schedule II to the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, even if they are capable of occasional non-agricultural use. The controlling test is the tractor&#039;s intrinsic character, including its design, mechanism, features and special adaptability, rather than exclusive agricultural use. Evidence that the tractors were licensed as farm tractors, designed for agricultural purposes and commonly used in farming supported their exclusion from tax. The view that exclusive agricultural use was required was disapproved, and incidental non-agricultural use was held insufficient to alter the tractor&#039;s agricultural character.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>