<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 204 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151121</link>
    <description>Frying and salting cashew-nuts did not amount to manufacture under the Bombay Sales Tax Act because the process did not produce a commercially different commodity; the nuts remained cashew-nuts, so the assessee&#039;s treatment activity was not manufacture. Fried and salted cashew-nuts sold in heat-sealed packets were also held not to be goods in a sealed container, because the packing was found to be a wrapper that could be opened and closed again without destroying the fastening; the sales therefore fell outside the sealed-container entry and within the alternative schedule entry. The Tribunal&#039;s factual findings on both classification questions were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 16:16:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 204 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151121</link>
      <description>Frying and salting cashew-nuts did not amount to manufacture under the Bombay Sales Tax Act because the process did not produce a commercially different commodity; the nuts remained cashew-nuts, so the assessee&#039;s treatment activity was not manufacture. Fried and salted cashew-nuts sold in heat-sealed packets were also held not to be goods in a sealed container, because the packing was found to be a wrapper that could be opened and closed again without destroying the fastening; the sales therefore fell outside the sealed-container entry and within the alternative schedule entry. The Tribunal&#039;s factual findings on both classification questions were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>