<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 156 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151110</link>
    <description>A Form C declaration covering more than one sale transaction is not automatically invalid in full merely because the aggregate exceeds the monetary limit in the proviso to rule 8(1-C) of the Central Sales Tax Rules. The restriction prevents one declaration from supporting all such transactions together, but it does not require rejection of the declaration in toto where some transactions independently satisfy the prescribed limit. Construed as ancillary to sections 8(1) and 8(4) of the Central Sales Tax Act, the rule was applied to preserve the statutory benefit for the qualifying transactions. The declaration was therefore valid in part for the transactions within the limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 15:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 156 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151110</link>
      <description>A Form C declaration covering more than one sale transaction is not automatically invalid in full merely because the aggregate exceeds the monetary limit in the proviso to rule 8(1-C) of the Central Sales Tax Rules. The restriction prevents one declaration from supporting all such transactions together, but it does not require rejection of the declaration in toto where some transactions independently satisfy the prescribed limit. Construed as ancillary to sections 8(1) and 8(4) of the Central Sales Tax Act, the rule was applied to preserve the statutory benefit for the qualifying transactions. The declaration was therefore valid in part for the transactions within the limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>