https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151097 Where appeals and stay applications against excise demand and penalty orders were already pending before the appellate tribunal, coercive recovery was treated as unjustified until those stay applications were decided. The attached goods could remain under attachment, but the authorities were not permitted to proceed with auction while the stay requests remained pending. Recovery proceedings were therefore kept in abeyance pending disposal of the stay applications, with interim protection against sale of the attached goods. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 May 2013 14:02:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151097 Where appeals and stay applications against excise demand and penalty orders were already pending before the appellate tribunal, coercive recovery was treated as unjustified until those stay applications were decided. The attached goods could remain under attachment, but the authorities were not permitted to proceed with auction while the stay requests remained pending. Recovery proceedings were therefore kept in abeyance pending disposal of the stay applications, with interim protection against sale of the attached goods. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151097