<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 447 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151080</link>
    <description>Phensedyl cough linctus, containing codeine phosphate within the notified limit and established in therapeutic practice, fell within the statutory exception to the definition of manufactured drug under the NDPS framework. Section 21 applied only to contraventions involving manufactured drugs and preparations, and the sample report showed codeine phosphate at 9.5 mg per 5 ml with 1.9 per cent concentration. Allegations of misuse by addicts, lack of purchase bills, or possible licence violations did not attract Section 21 and could at most raise issues under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Penal provisions were strictly construed, so the FIR and consequential proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 12:22:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 447 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151080</link>
      <description>Phensedyl cough linctus, containing codeine phosphate within the notified limit and established in therapeutic practice, fell within the statutory exception to the definition of manufactured drug under the NDPS framework. Section 21 applied only to contraventions involving manufactured drugs and preparations, and the sample report showed codeine phosphate at 9.5 mg per 5 ml with 1.9 per cent concentration. Allegations of misuse by addicts, lack of purchase bills, or possible licence violations did not attract Section 21 and could at most raise issues under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Penal provisions were strictly construed, so the FIR and consequential proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>