<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 907 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151075</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) affirming the assessee&#039;s ownership of the windmill and entitlement to depreciation for the assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the evidence supporting the assessee&#039;s ownership through agreements, payment details, and income receipts. The Tribunal found the transaction between the assessee and M/s. Surana Industries Ltd. to be genuine, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument of it being a finance transaction. The judgment was based on a thorough analysis of ownership, income assessment, and legal principles, delivered on April 23, 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 17:21:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 907 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151075</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) affirming the assessee&#039;s ownership of the windmill and entitlement to depreciation for the assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the evidence supporting the assessee&#039;s ownership through agreements, payment details, and income receipts. The Tribunal found the transaction between the assessee and M/s. Surana Industries Ltd. to be genuine, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument of it being a finance transaction. The judgment was based on a thorough analysis of ownership, income assessment, and legal principles, delivered on April 23, 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>