<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 929 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151070</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee by deleting the disallowance under section 40A(3) and accepting the book results. Additionally, the tribunal partially allowed the disallowance of depreciation on motor cars. The issue of charging interest under section 234B was deemed consequential and not adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 16:37:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 929 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151070</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee by deleting the disallowance under section 40A(3) and accepting the book results. Additionally, the tribunal partially allowed the disallowance of depreciation on motor cars. The issue of charging interest under section 234B was deemed consequential and not adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>