<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 927 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151064</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to apply an 8% net profit rate instead of the 10% rate initially applied by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering past history in assessments and ruled that there is no estoppel against the assessee&#039;s right to appeal, even if they initially agreed to a higher rate. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the decision was rendered on October 12, 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 14:50:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 927 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151064</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to apply an 8% net profit rate instead of the 10% rate initially applied by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering past history in assessments and ruled that there is no estoppel against the assessee&#039;s right to appeal, even if they initially agreed to a higher rate. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the decision was rendered on October 12, 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>