<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (9) TMI 165 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151040</link>
    <description>Adverse material in tax assessment may be used to reject accounts and sustain a best judgment assessment if it is disclosed to the assessee and a fair opportunity to explain is given. The inspecting officer&#039;s report recording stock shortages and excesses was part of the record, had been confronted to the assessee, and no request for cross-examination was made; reliance on that report therefore did not breach natural justice. The assessment authorities also had additional recorded material indicating manipulation in the books, so the Tribunal erred in finding no basis for estimation. The rejection of the books and the best judgment assessment were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 17:54:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=168079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (9) TMI 165 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151040</link>
      <description>Adverse material in tax assessment may be used to reject accounts and sustain a best judgment assessment if it is disclosed to the assessee and a fair opportunity to explain is given. The inspecting officer&#039;s report recording stock shortages and excesses was part of the record, had been confronted to the assessee, and no request for cross-examination was made; reliance on that report therefore did not breach natural justice. The assessment authorities also had additional recorded material indicating manipulation in the books, so the Tribunal erred in finding no basis for estimation. The rejection of the books and the best judgment assessment were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=151040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>